The people who are the guardians of our rights, and the people who are able to pass laws that limit those rights, are politicians. They, however, live in the public sphere.
If you have no idea what something is, how can you possibly protect it? Perhaps I am strange in the political breed, but I have, in my mind, less of a conception of the need of privacy then some others. As someone who has, albeit to a small extent, lived his life in a (small) public sphere, I know that, in terms of electability, there is no greater liability then nobody knowing who you are, or the wrong information getting out at the wrong time, leading me to be more open, or at the very least, more willing to be more open, than others.
In a world where the emails of politicians are subject to investigation by anyone who has the money to pay for a FOIP, where every detail of the life of a candidate is scrutinized and analyzed, how can they understand what it is like to want to protect your personal information. When polititians are forced into a world that treats privacy as a liability and a detriment to winning, any politician will leanr to live with a much smaller private sphere than others.
People need reminding that their rights cannot be taken for granted, particularly those rights that the lawmakers choose to waive for themselves. Remember to defend privacy by raising it with political types – in twenty years, when our own lives are an open book, we can be reminded that this is a defining issue of national importance, even if they cant understand it themselves. Put votes behind it, because even if politicians don’t get privacy, they do get ‘winning’.